Domestic security Essay

team up international says, As an organization, the Canadian Forces (cf. is the only agency able-bodied of providing the specific assets and professional friendship to set upon todays threats to interior(prenominal) bail. The CF is the only organization that possesses the corporate knowledge to undertake a task of such(prenominal) magnitude. However, throughout the probe Team planetary contradicts this point of view by stating the CF effectiveness could be augment to play a more than spry role in house servant pledge operation.An early(a) contradiction is presented by stating, in order to facilitate these changes, several inter organisational and interdepartmental relationships need to be developed and kept up(p) in conjunction with civil seedities, other political relations and other departments of the CF. Finally, the creator says the CF has ludicrous assets and the government can non afford to overlook them when considering domestic certificate issues. Thro ughout the essay, the precedent reveals a serial of contradictions leaving the lector with questions regarding domestic hostage whose responsibility is it? Team Global makes computer address to the CF having a primary agreement to encourage the country and its citizens while reason and securing Canada. In comparison with the civilian government organization, how different are these domestic trade protection responsibilities? The Canada run into Services Agency (CBSA) is affiliated to providing a smarter, more secure and effective margin.To achieve this goal, they add, the CBSA relies on technology, information sharing, run a risk delineate and biometrics, (Safety and trade protection). National auspices requires an combine approach to ensure early spotting and prevention of any potential threats to Canada and the public. Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), and provincial and municipal police services, The RCMP has refocused its National Security Investigations Sections (NSIS) to lead Integrated National Security Enforcement Teams (INSETs).The root states that since September 11, 2001, a government analysis of terrorist threats show the only agency undefended of both deterrence and prevention is the CF. The CF, being the only agency funds, would be directed exclusively to this organization. However, Ottawa ripe an initial investment of $7. 7 one million million to support a comprehensive, multi-year, multi-department federal schema to strengthen public safety and shelter by 2006 providing a contradicting reflection of funds, (Louis Osemwegie).Furthermore, the essay leans towards tradition with reference to past civilian security responsibilities. Team Global states, traditionally, direction and control of the Canadian territory, airspace and shipboard soldier area, lies with civilian agencies such as the department of Transport The threat of terrorism regarding domestic security in Canada traditionally lasted subsequently 9/11. When the author speaks of tradition and youthful government analysis, it misleads the actual role these organizations fork over played and continue to be baffling with Canadiandomestic security issues. An article by the Canadian Council of Chief Executives pass that after Sept 11 attacks, the Canadian government developed the concept of Reinventing Borders. The Council explains, in order to achieve what the Canadian government has described as a environ is something that is open for business but closed to terrorism. This indicates to the reader that it is clear that government civilian organization remain a component of Canadian domestic security in reference to smart border declaration and accord.Next confusion is and focused with regards to sole responsibility of domestic security when discussing legislation, policies, constitution and the National defence reaction Act (NDA). Rules and regulation are utilise to guide, dire ct and set limitation with restrictions to corroborate a certain order within society and the organization acting within. The Canadian Forces is being pointed out by the author as the sole organization fitted of handling the task and responsibilities of Canadian domestic security.It is fair to question then, why do the policies, legislation, NDA and Canadian Constitution Act 1867 outline rules with respect to civil power? They beef up a joint driveway to exist between CF and civilian organizations. again the author says, the protection of the Canadian coastline is delimit through Defence policies, which encourage maritime elements to increase surveillance of Canadian irrigate and approaches in the cooperation with the Canadian Coast Guard, the segment of Fisheries and Oceans and the United States Coast Guard.Again, a contradiction is made by the author who now reflects a combined effort as an effective means. Finally, Team Global states, due to the CFs unique operational e xperience and assets, they are all capable of providing both the corporate knowledge and skills required to provide sound domestic security. With regards to the assets, team global explain that the Canadian Navy with its Frigates and Victoria class submarines are unique to domestic security capabilities. Louis ? fe ?semwegie states, in the Maritimes, it means acquiring patrol vessels to augment the Navy with added capabilities to enable interoperability with navy blue and US Coast Guard, instead of buying an expensive Destroyer or more Victoria class submarines, supposedly, other iciness War legacies. Furthermore, submarines are said to be highly effective at sinking ships and other submarines, but they are of lesser or no use in peacekeeping and peace building operations, or even in conducting coastal patrols to protect fisheries and catch smugglers, (Staples and Robinson).In conclusion, Team Globals view and evidence presents a number of contradictions throughout the essay. Which organization go around(p) fits the role of Canadian Domestic Security is not clear. Much discussion is forwarded in relation to organizations, i. e. civilian, Canadian Forces and assets accompanying both. The reader is left to make his or her finale of Domestic Security and Canadas best fit solution. Canada, being a generous democratic society presents the voice of its citizens as a liberal democratic society. The author has educated the reader of what organizations are compound but is unclear of whom is solely responsible.